Skip to content

Conversation

@quasisamurai
Copy link
Contributor

@quasisamurai quasisamurai commented Aug 17, 2023

@quasisamurai quasisamurai changed the title add new binding NTRN-70 add new params binding (sdk-470 Aug 17, 2023
@quasisamurai quasisamurai changed the title NTRN-70 add new params binding (sdk-470 NTRN-70 add new params binding (sdk-47) Aug 17, 2023
@quasisamurai quasisamurai changed the title NTRN-70 add new params binding (sdk-47) Rework governance/ update admin-module NTRN-70(sdk-47) Aug 25, 2023
@quasisamurai quasisamurai changed the title Rework governance/ update admin-module NTRN-70(sdk-47) Rework governance/ update admin-module NTRN-70 (sdk-47) Aug 25, 2023
@quasisamurai quasisamurai marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2023 10:56
@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler changed the base branch from main to sdk/47 August 29, 2023 13:36
}
}

/// Basic helper to define a parameter change proposal passed to AdminModule:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update comments for submit_upgrade_proposal and for submit_client_update_proposal — they still claim that those are helpers for parameter change proposals creation

pub contract: String,
/// ProposalExecuteMessage defines the struct for sdk47 compatible update params admin proposal.
pub struct ProposalExecuteMessage {
/// **message** is a json representing a sdk message passed to admin module to execute.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/// **message** is a json representing a sdk message passed to admin module to execute.
/// **message** is a json representing an sdk message passed to admin module to execute.

@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler merged commit 51c5d33 into sdk/47 Sep 7, 2023
@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler deleted the feat/sdk47 branch September 28, 2023 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants