feat: testing] Test PooledEmbedding.mean_pooling - #252
Conversation
Co-authored-by: n24q02m <135627235+n24q02m@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
Co-authored-by: n24q02m <135627235+n24q02m@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: The class method
mean_poolinginPooledEmbeddinglacked unit tests. This method wraps mathematical functionality mapping unmasked tokens arrays to mean pooled representations.📊 Coverage:
attention_maskvalues.attention_mask, verifying the division-by-zero avoidance strategy.✨ Result: Test coverage for
PooledEmbeddingis vastly improved and mathematical accuracy ofmean_poolingin edge cases is safely protected against future regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 7521944429730682362 started by @n24q02m