fix #4837 Upgrade glob dependency to 8.0.3

[joewagner]

Description of the Change

The minimatch npm package version <=3.0.4 has a security vulnerability explained here: GHSA-f8q6-p94x-37v3

Mocha has the glob package 7.2.0 as a dependency, which in turn has minimatch ^3.0.4 as a dependency

This results in a high security risk warning for consumers of mocha. See #4937 for an example.

This PR changes the glob dependency to 8.0.3 which no longer depends on the insecure version of minimatch.

Alternate Designs

The current glob version is a fixed value (7.2.0), I thought about using the ^ to set it as ^8.0.3 but the other dependencies here are all fixed versions so I'm following suit.

Why should this be in core?

It's not possible to fix #4937 without updating core.

Benefits

Fix security concerns raised in GHSA-f8q6-p94x-37v3

Possible Drawbacks

All tests pass for me, and I see no drawbacks.

Applicable issues

Applicable Issue is #4937
This should be suitable for a patch release.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: joewagner / name: Joe Wagner (5629d61)

[juergba]

@joewagner thank you.

I don't agree with your description and conclusions.

$ npm list minimatch -all --production
mocha@10.1.0 D:\mocha-fork\mocha
├─┬ glob@7.2.0
│ └── minimatch@3.1.2
└── minimatch@5.0.1

While installing mocha correctly, minimatch ^3.0.4 resolves to v3.1.2 which - as per your description - should not print any vulnerability report.

[joewagner]

@juergba Thanks for checking this out.
I'm not reporting a security vulnerability, since as you point out module resolution lands on secure versions.
But since ^3.04 is inclusive of the 3.04 version of minimatch, other packages will end up getting security alerts.
Here's a dependabot example: https://github.com/tablelandnetwork/local-tableland/security/dependabot/2
I figured that since other people were getting the same type of alerts I'd try to make a fix. Are there any drawbacks to upgrading?

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 94.326% when pulling 5629d61 on joewagner:joewagner/upgrade-glob into 8f3c37b on mochajs:master.

[juergba]

Are there any drawbacks to upgrading?

If you can fix the failing tests on Windows, then I don't see any drawbacks.

[joewagner]

If you can fix the failing tests on Windows, then I don't see any drawbacks.

I don't use windows. I can try to set up a vm and look at this, but it may take me a while to find the time.

[jb2311]

@joewagner @juergba Is it okay for me to take over this PR/branch?

[juergba]

@jb2311 yes, it's probably better to open a new PR. I would close this one then.

[joewagner]

@joewagner @juergba Is it okay for me to take over this PR/branch?

Definitely! Thanks for taking this on, and sorry I didn't find time to setup a Windows env.

[jb2311]

created this PR: #4970

All the tests passed on my local windows machine. Only difference from this PR is a newer version of glob