add test to verify symlinks targets are preserved (skipped)

[thaJeztah]

Symlink targets are considered opaque and preserved as-is, even if it doesn't match the platform.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.13%. Comparing base (2cd730e) to head (bddbecd).
⚠️ Report is 47 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.35%   66.13%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          42       32      -10     
  Lines        2027     1949      -78     
==========================================
- Hits         1345     1289      -56     
+ Misses        497      494       -3     
+ Partials      185      166      -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[thaJeztah]

Ugh, so that doesn't work; os.Symlink normalizes, and os.Root.Symlink doesn't;
https://go.dev/src/os/file_windows.go

// Symlink creates newname as a symbolic link to oldname.
// On Windows, a symlink to a non-existent oldname creates a file symlink;
// if oldname is later created as a directory the symlink will not work.
/ If there is an error, it will be of type *LinkError.
func Symlink(oldname, newname string) error {
  	// '/' does not work in link's content
  	oldname = filepathlite.FromSlash(oldname)

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.