Skip to content

[AutoPR- Security] Patch polkit for CVE-2025-7519 [MEDIUM] #14326

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[AutoPR- Security] Patch polkit for CVE-2025-7519 [MEDIUM] #14326

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

azurelinux-security
Copy link
Contributor

@azurelinux-security azurelinux-security commented Jul 17, 2025 •
edited by Kanishk-Bansal
Loading

Auto Patch polkit for CVE-2025-7519.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner-chatbot/_build/results?buildId=870493&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge
Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues
  • N/A
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 08:48
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2025 08:48
@Malateshk007 Malateshk007 requested a review from mfrw July 18, 2025 08:57
mfrw
mfrw approved these changes Jul 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

diff looks good.

@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Jul 22, 2025

@mfrw Please check whether it's a cleanly applying patch. If not, please check the backported changes and provide your justification in comments

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

@mfrw Please check whether it's a cleanly applying patch. If not, please check the backported changes and provide your justification in comments

the patch applies cleanly

mfrw
mfrw reviewed Jul 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
SPECS/polkit/CVE-2025-7519.patch
index 3894fe9..c9fa23e 100644
--- a/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendactionpool.c
+++ b/src/polkitbackend/polkitbackendactionpool.c
@@ -672,6 +672,12 @@ _start (void *data, const char *el, const char **attr)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@0xba1a The patch applies cleanly and the only delta is line numbers from the reference patch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mfrw mfrw mfrw approved these changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
AutoPR-Security main PR Destined for main Packaging security
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@azurelinux-security @0xba1a @Kanishk-Bansal @mfrw