No Windows docker reference for non-interactive / matlab-batch

[richard-harbinger]

There is no reference docker for windows-based image which includes appropriate dependencies for mathworks, simulink, etc.

Some 3rd party mathworks products include windows dependencies. The use-case would be to enable modern CI / other non-interactive mathworks workflows for stacks which includes these windows dependencies.

[drobinson0]

Hi @richard-harbinger ,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention, this feedback will be forwarded to our development team for consideration, and we will evaluate its inclusion in a future release of the offering.

To help us understand the use case and what you have tried, can you tell us more about how you intend to utilize a Windows Docker container? Have you already tried creating a Dockerfile and, if so, did you have any difficulties getting the container working or your use case? This information will be useful for us in developing a product in a future release.

Thanks again for your feedback!

[richard-harbinger]

Hello David & Mathworks team, The intended use-case of the Windows docker container is to perform tasks which rely on 3rd party products working with Matlab / Simulink that have Windows dependencies (specifically code-generation / build / compile packages for embedded software). I have tried creating a Dockerfile and with much difficulty I was able to get it working up to the point where i have issues with the 3rd party products. A published reference with what windows reference image has necessary dependencies, and particularly a light-as-possible version of what is needed to use mathworks would help greatly and allow improvement of what I have been able to do. Thanks, Richard

…

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:56 AM David Robinson ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @richard-harbinger <https://github.com/richard-harbinger> , Thank you for bringing this to our attention, this feedback will be forwarded to our development team for consideration, and we will evaluate its inclusion in a future release of the offering. To help us understand the use case and what you have tried, can you tell us more about how you intend to utilize a Windows Docker container? Have you already tried creating a Dockerfile and, if so, did you have any difficulties getting the container working or your use case? This information will be useful for us in developing a product in a future release. Thanks again for your feedback! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#134 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A43YDIWD5G7UEYZQO2UE6CD2OM5XFAVCNFSM6AAAAABVQ7KEVWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMZZGQ4DQMRZGA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in this message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any other person without the written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please delete this message and inform the sender so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.