[RTG] Rely on textual pass pipeline in Python and CAPI #8797
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The textual pass pipeline has a bit more overhead due to the string parsing, but it reduces the required maintenance as we don't have to write CAPI and Python bindings for all the pass options.
maerhart
force-pushed
the
maerhart-rtg-pass-capi
branch
from
81a903e to
2e3aa69
Compare
fabianschuiki
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2025
Contributor
fabianschuiki
left a comment
fabianschuiki
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a pretty cool idea!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The textual pass pipeline has a bit more overhead due to the string parsing (I guess), but it reduces the required maintenance as we don't have to write CAPI and Python bindings for all the pass options.