feat!(ci): Remove arm/v7 support #14308
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd-extension-init
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308 Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd2-proxy
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308 Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd2-proxy-init
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd-await
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/dev
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
olix0r
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
olix0r
pushed a commit
to linkerd/dev
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
olix0r
pushed a commit
to linkerd/linkerd-await
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd2-proxy-init
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd-extension-init
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308 Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
sfleen
added a commit
to linkerd/linkerd2-proxy
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2025
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost. This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported. Related: linkerd/linkerd2#14308 Signed-off-by: Scott Fleener <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This architecture has become too significant of a maintenance burden, and isn't used often enough to justify the associated maintenance cost.
This removes arm/v7 from all the build infrastructure/dockerfiles/etc. Note that arm64 targets are still widely used and well supported.