Skip to content

fix python #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2016
Merged

fix python #9

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2016

Conversation

cloud-fan
Copy link
Collaborator

This change is Review on Reviewable

liancheng added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2016
@liancheng liancheng merged commit cf0c112 into liancheng:ds-to-df Mar 10, 2016
liancheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR brings the support for chained Python UDFs, for example

```sql
select udf1(udf2(a))
select udf1(udf2(a) + 3)
select udf1(udf2(a) + udf3(b))
```

Also directly chained unary Python UDFs are put in single batch of Python UDFs, others may require multiple batches.

For example,
```python
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- Project [pythonUDF#10 AS double(double(1))#9]
:     +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(double(1)), [pythonUDF#10]
   +- Scan OneRowRelation[]
>>> sqlContext.sql("select double(double(1) + double(2))").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- Project [pythonUDF#19 AS double((double(1) + double(2)))apache#16]
:     +- INPUT
+- !BatchPythonEvaluation double((pythonUDF#17 + pythonUDF#18)), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18,pythonUDF#19]
   +- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(2), [pythonUDF#17,pythonUDF#18]
      +- !BatchPythonEvaluation double(1), [pythonUDF#17]
         +- Scan OneRowRelation[]
```

TODO: will support multiple unrelated Python UDFs in one batch (another PR).

## How was this patch tested?

Added new unit tests for chained UDFs.

Author: Davies Liu <[email protected]>

Closes apache#12014 from davies/py_udfs.
liancheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to optimize GroupExpressions by removing repeating expressions. `RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions` is added.

**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("select a+1 from values 1,2 T(a) group by a+1, 1+a, A+1, 1+A").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0)#9], functions=[], output=[(a + 1)#5])
:     +- INPUT
+- Exchange hashpartitioning((a#0 + 1)#6, (1 + a#0)#7, (A#0 + 1)#8, (1 + A#0)#9, 200), None
   +- WholeStageCodegen
      :  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1) AS (a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0) AS (1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1) AS (A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0) AS (1 + A#0)#9], functions=[], output=[(a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0)#9])
      :     +- INPUT
      +- LocalTableScan [a#0], [[1],[2]]
```

**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select a+1 from values 1,2 T(a) group by a+1, 1+a, A+1, 1+A").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1)#6], functions=[], output=[(a + 1)#5])
:     +- INPUT
+- Exchange hashpartitioning((a#0 + 1)#6, 200), None
   +- WholeStageCodegen
      :  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1) AS (a#0 + 1)#6], functions=[], output=[(a#0 + 1)#6])
      :     +- INPUT
      +- LocalTableScan [a#0], [[1],[2]]
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests (with a new testcase)

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

Closes apache#12590 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14830.
liancheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to optimize GroupExpressions by removing repeating expressions. `RemoveRepetitionFromGroupExpressions` is added.

**Before**
```scala
scala> sql("select a+1 from values 1,2 T(a) group by a+1, 1+a, A+1, 1+A").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0)#9], functions=[], output=[(a + 1)#5])
:     +- INPUT
+- Exchange hashpartitioning((a#0 + 1)#6, (1 + a#0)#7, (A#0 + 1)#8, (1 + A#0)#9, 200), None
   +- WholeStageCodegen
      :  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1) AS (a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0) AS (1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1) AS (A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0) AS (1 + A#0)#9], functions=[], output=[(a#0 + 1)#6,(1 + a#0)#7,(A#0 + 1)#8,(1 + A#0)#9])
      :     +- INPUT
      +- LocalTableScan [a#0], [[1],[2]]
```

**After**
```scala
scala> sql("select a+1 from values 1,2 T(a) group by a+1, 1+a, A+1, 1+A").explain()
== Physical Plan ==
WholeStageCodegen
:  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1)#6], functions=[], output=[(a + 1)#5])
:     +- INPUT
+- Exchange hashpartitioning((a#0 + 1)#6, 200), None
   +- WholeStageCodegen
      :  +- TungstenAggregate(key=[(a#0 + 1) AS (a#0 + 1)#6], functions=[], output=[(a#0 + 1)#6])
      :     +- INPUT
      +- LocalTableScan [a#0], [[1],[2]]
```

## How was this patch tested?

Pass the Jenkins tests (with a new testcase)

Author: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

Closes apache#12590 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-14830.

(cherry picked from commit 6e63201)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants