-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
[add] clarify interactive properties file #102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…treme importance to the overall benchmark
2c24e41
to
e1a876b
Compare
@filipecosta90 thanks for opening this PR! One question: the proposed frequency numbers seem to target SF100, is that correct? I think we'd better put SF1 values in the example property files (especially given that the properties files for some implementations, e.g. Postgres, actually encode the data set in the file). WDYT? |
Totally agree. Changing frequency values to match SF1 |
Looks good, thanks! |
One thing though... where did the update interleave For me, SF1 shows 113040. $ cat params.ini
ldbc.snb.datagen.generator.scaleFactor:snb.interactive.1
ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.dynamicActivitySerializer:ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.snb.csv.dynamicserializer.activity.CsvBasicDynamicActivitySerializer
ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.dynamicPersonSerializer:ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.snb.csv.dynamicserializer.person.CsvBasicDynamicPersonSerializer
ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.staticSerializer:ldbc.snb.datagen.serializer.snb.csv.staticserializer.CsvBasicStaticSerializer
# To generate RFC 3339-compliant timestamps (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339), uncomment the following line:
#ldbc.snb.datagen.util.formatter.StringDateFormatter.dateTimeFormat:yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS+00:00
$ cat social_network/updateStream.properties
ldbc.snb.interactive.gct_delta_duration:10000
ldbc.snb.interactive.min_write_event_start_time:1347528980076
ldbc.snb.interactive.max_write_event_start_time:1570999509040
ldbc.snb.interactive.update_interleave:113040
ldbc.snb.interactive.num_events:1976901 |
for me it shows 4477 for SF1. Should it be related to our different
|
@filipecosta90 thanks! It seems some of our changes in the |
ldbc.snb.interactive.update_interleave
value.