Skip to content

Conversation

@ahnpnl
Copy link
Collaborator

@ahnpnl ahnpnl commented Dec 2, 2025

Test plan

Green CI

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

N.A.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI/CD pipeline tooling to the latest version for improved code quality scanning and analysis capabilities.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the SonarCloud Scan GitHub Action in the CI workflow from version 5.3.2 to 6.0.0. The action reference was bumped to use the latest commit SHA, with no changes to environment variables, token configuration, or workflow logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Update
\\.github/workflows/ci.yml
Updated SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action from v5.3.2 (commit 2f77a1ec) to v6.0.0 (commit fd88b7d7). Environment configuration and token usage remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single dependency version bump in a workflow file
  • No functional logic changes or control flow modifications
  • Configuration remains identical aside from action reference

Poem

A rabbit hops through workflows bright,
SonarCloud now scans with newer might,
Version six arrives, the tests still run,
Quality checks shine—the work is done! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'ci: update sonar scan action version to v6' clearly and concisely summarizes the main change in the pull request—updating the SonarCloud scan action to version 6.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch infra/sonar-scan-workflow

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a34ec11 and 351963e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

123-124: LGTM!

The v6.0.0 breaking change involves how the args input is now parsed differently to prevent command-line injection, but this workflow doesn't use the args parameter—it only configures SONAR_TOKEN via environment variables. The upgrade is safe and aligns with the PR's claim of no breaking changes for this codebase.


123-124: No action needed. The sonarqube-scan-action v6.0.0 upgrade is safe for this workflow. While v6.0.0 includes a breaking change in how arguments are parsed (due to a rewrite from Bash to JavaScript for security), this workflow does not pass any custom arguments to the action, so the breaking change does not apply. The upgrade introduces a security fix for a command-injection vulnerability and poses no risk to the current configuration.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2025

PR Preview Action v1.6.3
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2025-12-02 13:16 UTC

@ahnpnl ahnpnl force-pushed the infra/sonar-scan-workflow branch from 63b4ea1 to 351963e Compare December 2, 2025 11:32
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@ahnpnl ahnpnl marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 11:41
@ahnpnl ahnpnl requested a review from kulshekhar as a code owner December 2, 2025 11:41
@ahnpnl ahnpnl merged commit 9973892 into main Dec 2, 2025
22 checks passed
@ahnpnl ahnpnl deleted the infra/sonar-scan-workflow branch December 2, 2025 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants