Skip to content

Conversation

nabuskey
Copy link
Contributor

@nabuskey nabuskey commented Jul 11, 2025

Purpose of this PR

This adds two additional print columns: state and podname. Adding them should make it easier for end users to figure out what is happening to the spark connect server.

k get sparkconn
NAME            AGE   STATUS     PODNAME
spark-connect   59s   NotReady   spark-connect-server

Proposed changes:

  • adds two additional print columns: state and podname
  • <Change 2>
  • <Change 3>

Change Category

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that could affect existing functionality)
  • Documentation update

Rationale

Checklist

  • I have conducted a self-review of my own code.
  • I have updated documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests that prove my changes are effective or that my feature works.
  • Existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.

Additional Notes

@nabuskey nabuskey changed the title additional printer columns for spark connect Add print columns for Spark Connect Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@vara-bonthu vara-bonthu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ChenYi015
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ChenYi015

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit bfd7349 into kubeflow:master Jul 16, 2025
15 checks passed
@ChenYi015 ChenYi015 mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants