Skip to content

Update kubeflow/model-registry manifests from v0.2.21#3195

Merged
google-oss-prow[bot] merged 3 commits into
kubeflow:masterfrom
tarilabs:synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21
Aug 4, 2025
Merged

Update kubeflow/model-registry manifests from v0.2.21#3195
google-oss-prow[bot] merged 3 commits into
kubeflow:masterfrom
tarilabs:synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21

Conversation

@tarilabs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pull Request Template for Kubeflow Manifests

✏️ Summary of Changes

Periodic update Model Registry release

📦 Dependencies

n/a

🐛 Related Issues

n/a

✅ Contributor Checklist

  • I have tested these changes with kustomize (done via integration tests). See Installation Prerequisites.
  • All commits are signed-off to satisfy the DCO check.
  • I have considered adding my company to the adopters page to support Kubeflow and help the community, since I expect help from the community for my issue (see 1. and 2.).

You can join the CNCF Slack and access our meetings at the Kubeflow Community website. Our channel on the CNCF Slack is here #kubeflow-platform.

Signed-off-by: tarilabs <matteo.mortari@gmail.com>
@tarilabs tarilabs force-pushed the synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21 branch from 554e25f to 532ca0c Compare July 31, 2025 08:54

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check the networkpolicies https://github.com/kubeflow/manifests/tree/master/common/networkpolicies/base. Maybe you need to change them given your changes here.

@juliusvonkohout juliusvonkohout left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think due to the new database and catalog deployments you might need to adjust the networkpolicies https://github.com/kubeflow/manifests/tree/master/common/networkpolicies/base

@tarilabs tarilabs force-pushed the synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21 branch from 77a51f5 to 7077487 Compare July 31, 2025 09:53
linting

chore: add a network policy for model catalog (#1)

linting

Signed-off-by: tarilabs <matteo.mortari@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Paul Boyd <paul@pboyd.io>
@tarilabs tarilabs force-pushed the synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21 branch from f8ccdf9 to 1d2022d Compare July 31, 2025 13:24
@tarilabs tarilabs requested a review from juliusvonkohout July 31, 2025 13:28
@tarilabs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

unrelated failure in Notebook step
Run sed "s/kubeflow-user-example-com/$KF_PROFILE/g" tests/notebook.test.kubeflow-user-example.com.yaml | kubectl apply -f -
notebook.kubeflow.org/test created
error: no matching resources found
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

Signed-off-by: juliusvonkohout <45896133+juliusvonkohout@users.noreply.github.com>
@juliusvonkohout juliusvonkohout force-pushed the synchronize-kubeflow-model-registry-manifests-v0.2.21 branch from fa11b85 to 045a128 Compare August 4, 2025 13:34
@juliusvonkohout

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/lgtm
/approve

Thank you. By the way do you have news regarding enabling the UI by default @tarilabs ?

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow Bot added the lgtm label Aug 4, 2025
@google-oss-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: juliusvonkohout

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow Bot merged commit 6f42d71 into kubeflow:master Aug 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@tarilabs

tarilabs commented Aug 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/lgtm /approve

Thank you. By the way do you have news regarding enabling the UI by default @tarilabs ?

we have it tracked on roadmap: kubeflow/hub#863

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants