-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Small fixes to compilation/linking #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
josefbacik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2012
Small fixes to compilation/linking
josefbacik
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2020
…_info_cache() This bug is exposed by fsck-test with D=asan, hit by test case 020, with the following error report: ================================================================= ==10740==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x621000061580 at pc 0x56051f0db6cd bp 0x7ffe170f3e20 sp 0x7ffe170f3e10 READ of size 1 at 0x621000061580 thread T0 #0 0x56051f0db6cc in btrfs_extent_inline_ref_type /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.h:1727 #1 0x56051f13b669 in build_roots_info_cache /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14306 #2 0x56051f13c86a in repair_root_items /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14450 #3 0x56051f13ea89 in cmd_check /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14965 #4 0x56051efe75bb in main /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs.c:302 #5 0x7f04ddbb0f49 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20f49) #6 0x56051efe68c9 in _start (/home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs+0x5b8c9) 0x621000061580 is located 0 bytes to the right of 4224-byte region [0x621000060500,0x621000061580) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7f04ded50ce1 in __interceptor_calloc /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:70 #1 0x56051f04685e in __alloc_extent_buffer /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent_io.c:553 #2 0x56051f047563 in alloc_extent_buffer /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent_io.c:687 #3 0x56051efff1d1 in btrfs_find_create_tree_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/disk-io.c:187 #4 0x56051f000133 in read_tree_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/disk-io.c:327 #5 0x56051efeddb8 in read_node_slot /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:652 #6 0x56051effb0d9 in btrfs_next_leaf /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:2853 #7 0x56051f13b343 in build_roots_info_cache /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14267 #8 0x56051f13c86a in repair_root_items /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14450 #9 0x56051f13ea89 in cmd_check /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14965 #10 0x56051efe75bb in main /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs.c:302 #11 0x7f04ddbb0f49 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20f49) It's completely possible that one extent/metadata item has no inline reference, while build_roots_info_cache() doesn't have such check. Fix it by checking @iref against item end to avoid such problem. Issue: #92 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
josefbacik
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2020
…y wrong condition to free delayed ref/head. [BUG] When btrfs-progs is compiled with D=asan, it can't pass even the very basic fsck tests due to btrfs-image has memory leak: === START TEST /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/tests//fsck-tests/001-bad-file-extent-bytenr restoring image default_case.img ================================================================= ==7790==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 104 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f1d3b738389 in __interceptor_malloc /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:86 #1 0x560ca6b7f4ff in btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/delayed-ref.c:569 #2 0x560ca6af2d0b in btrfs_free_extent /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent-tree.c:2155 #3 0x560ca6ac16ca in __btrfs_cow_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:319 #4 0x560ca6ac1d8c in btrfs_cow_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:383 #5 0x560ca6ac6c8e in btrfs_search_slot /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:1153 #6 0x560ca6ab7e83 in fixup_device_size image/main.c:2113 #7 0x560ca6ab9279 in fixup_chunks_and_devices image/main.c:2333 #8 0x560ca6ab9ada in restore_metadump image/main.c:2455 #9 0x560ca6abaeba in main image/main.c:2723 #10 0x7f1d3b148ce2 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x23ce2) ... tons of similar leakage for delayed_tree_ref ... Direct leak of 96 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f1d3b738389 in __interceptor_malloc /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:86 #1 0x560ca6b7f5fb in btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/delayed-ref.c:583 #2 0x560ca6af5679 in alloc_tree_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent-tree.c:2503 #3 0x560ca6af57ac in btrfs_alloc_free_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent-tree.c:2524 #4 0x560ca6ac115b in __btrfs_cow_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:290 #5 0x560ca6ac1d8c in btrfs_cow_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:383 #6 0x560ca6b7bb15 in commit_tree_roots /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/transaction.c:98 #7 0x560ca6b7c525 in btrfs_commit_transaction /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/transaction.c:192 #8 0x560ca6ab92be in fixup_chunks_and_devices image/main.c:2337 #9 0x560ca6ab9ada in restore_metadump image/main.c:2455 #10 0x560ca6abaeba in main image/main.c:2723 #11 0x7f1d3b148ce2 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x23ce2) ... tons of similar leakage for delayed_ref_head ... SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 1600 byte(s) leaked in 16 allocation(s). failed to restore image ./default_case.img [CAUSE] Commit c603970 ("btrfs-progs: Add delayed refs infrastructure") introduces delayed ref infrastructure for free space tree, however the refcount_dec_and_test() from kernel code is wrongly backported. refcount_dec_and_test() will return true if the refcount reaches 0. So kernel code will free the allocated space as expected: if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ref->refs)) { kmem_cache_free(); } However btrfs-progs backport is using the opposite condition: if (--ref->refs) { kfree(); } This will not free the memory for the last user, but for refs >= 2. Causing both use-after-free and memory leak for any offline write operation. [FIX] Fix the (--ref->refs) condition to (--ref->refs == 0) to fix the backport error. Fixes: c603970 ("btrfs-progs: Add delayed refs infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recent gcc (4.6.1) fails to compile and link due to wrong
fprintf
format specifier forlong int
and due to missing-pthread
option to the gcc frontend.