Skip to content

test(lts): test against rc build 2.504.3#2048

Closed
TheMeinerLP wants to merge 3 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
TheMeinerLP:stable-2.504.3
Closed

test(lts): test against rc build 2.504.3#2048
TheMeinerLP wants to merge 3 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
TheMeinerLP:stable-2.504.3

Conversation

@TheMeinerLP
Copy link
Member

@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP commented Jun 12, 2025

Test against RC build of 2.504.3

Only for testing. Please do not merge.

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed

@TheMeinerLP TheMeinerLP changed the title Acceptance tests for 2.504.3 test(lts): test against rc build 2.504.3 Jun 12, 2025
@krisstern
Copy link
Member

@MarkEWaite are these failures okay to ignore, or do they require fixes?

@krisstern krisstern marked this pull request as draft June 12, 2025 12:31
@krisstern krisstern requested a review from a team June 12, 2025 14:04
@krisstern
Copy link
Member

@jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness-developers is it safe to ignore the failures and go ahead with an official (delayed) RC release at this stage?

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

@jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness-developers is it safe to ignore the failures and go ahead with an official (delayed) RC release at this stage?

Yes, it is OK to proceed with the release candidate in spite of these test failures. These test failures seem to be due to a change in the job config history plugin . The job config history plugin UI overhaul released 4 days ago has caused that automated test to timeout while waiting to complete a dialog box.

A screen recording is included in the failing test result .

@mawinter69 would you be willing to investigate the changes that are needed for the saving_global_config_should_not_create_job_change acceptance test?

I'll also post that information to the issue:

@mawinter69
Copy link
Contributor

The failure is related to jenkinsci/job-config-history-plugin#363

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants