-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
fix(tabs): 兼容16的处理 #3150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(tabs): 兼容16的处理 #3150
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Walkthrough本次变更更新了两个 Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TabPane
participant Renderer
TabPane->>Renderer: 检查是否存在 children
alt 存在 children
TabPane->>Renderer: 检查 disabled 状态
alt 未禁用 (disabled=false)
Renderer-->>TabPane: 渲染容器并包含 children
else 已禁用 (disabled=true)
Renderer-->>TabPane: 渲染容器但不包含 children
end
else
Renderer-->>TabPane: 返回 null
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat_v3.x #3150 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 87.18% 87.20% +0.01%
=============================================
Files 280 279 -1
Lines 18525 18538 +13
Branches 2816 2822 +6
=============================================
+ Hits 16151 16166 +15
+ Misses 2369 2367 -2
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.taro.tsx
(1 hunks)src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx
[warning] 35-35: src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.taro.tsx (1)
34-36
: 保持了跨平台实现的一致性,提高了代码可读性这个修改与 Web 版本的修改保持一致,将逻辑与(&&)运算符替换为三元运算符。这种改进明确了条件渲染的流程,使代码更加清晰易读,同时确保了在 Taro 环境中与 React 16 的兼容性。
这种一致性的修改有助于减少在不同平台之间切换时可能出现的混淆和错误,是一个很好的实践。
return children ? ( | ||
<div className={classes}>{!disabled && children}</div> | ||
) : null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
代码修改提高了逻辑清晰度,并解决了 React 16 兼容性问题
将逻辑与(&&)运算符替换为三元运算符是一个很好的改进。这种修改明确了当 children
不存在时返回 null
,而不是可能导致的隐式 undefined
。这解决了在 React 16 中可能出现的渲染问题,使组件行为更加可预测。
不过,根据静态分析工具的提示,第 35 行(返回 null 的情况)没有被测试覆盖。建议添加相应的测试用例,确保这种边缘情况得到正确处理。
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否有相关的测试用例验证 children 为空的情况
rg -n "test.*(?:without|empty|no|null).*children" --type ts src/packages/tabpane/__tests__/
Length of output: 165
重点:请添加针对 children 为空情况的测试用例
代码修改提升了逻辑清晰度,并解决了 React 16 兼容性问题。将逻辑与(&&)运算符替换为三元运算符,使组件在 children 为空时明确返回 null,避免了可能的隐式 undefined 问题。
不过,目前在项目中没有找到可验证 children 为空(返回 null)的测试用例,可能会导致这一边缘情况在未来未被覆盖。建议补充相应的测试用例,以确保此情况得到正确处理。
- 文件位置:src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx(第 33-35 行)
- 建议为 children 为空的情况增加测试覆盖
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 35-35: src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx (1)
33-35
: 优化了React 16中对空children的处理方式这个修改很好地解决了React 16中对于falsy值处理的兼容性问题。使用三元运算符替代逻辑与(&&)操作符可以确保在children为falsy值时明确返回null,而不是可能导致意外渲染行为的其他falsy值(如false或undefined)。
这种方式更加明确且安全,特别是在React 16及以上版本中,明确返回null是表示"不渲染任何内容"的推荐方式。
考虑添加单元测试来覆盖children为null或undefined的情况,以确保这部分逻辑在未来的更改中保持稳定。
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 35-35: src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by testssrc/packages/tabpane/tabpane.taro.tsx (1)
34-36
: 优化了React 16中对空children的处理方式这个修改很好地解决了React 16中对于falsy值处理的兼容性问题。使用三元运算符替代逻辑与(&&)操作符可以确保在children为falsy值时明确返回null,而不是可能导致意外渲染行为的其他falsy值(如false或undefined)。
这种方式更加明确且安全,特别是在React 16及以上版本中,明确返回null是表示"不渲染任何内容"的推荐方式。而且这个修改与web版本保持了一致性,确保了跨平台行为的一致性。
建议添加单元测试来覆盖children为null或undefined的情况,以确保这部分逻辑在未来的更改中保持稳定。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.taro.tsx
(1 hunks)src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx
[warning] 35-35: src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx (1)
35-35
:❓ Verification inconclusive
测试覆盖率提示
静态分析工具显示第35行(返回null的情况)没有被测试覆盖。建议添加针对TabPane组件在children为falsy值情况下的单元测试。
可以通过创建一个测试用例,传入null、undefined或false作为children来验证组件的行为。
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 搜索当前存在的TabPane相关测试 fd test --exec grep -l "TabPane" {} \;Length of output: 5542
测试覆盖率缺失 – 请添加针对假值 children 的单元测试
当前在
src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx
第35行的代码) : null未被现有测试覆盖。静态分析工具提示在 children 为假值(如
null
、undefined
或false
)时,组件的返回逻辑没有测试验证,可能存在隐患。建议:
- 在 TabPane 组件的单元测试中新增用例,分别传入
null
、undefined
和false
作为 children,以验证组件是否正确返回null
。- 请手动确认当前项目中是否已有覆盖该分支的测试,由于自动检索测试文件的命令输出不够明确(部分输出提示目录错误),建议进行人工复查。
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 35-35: src/packages/tabpane/tabpane.tsx#L35
Added line #L35 was not covered by tests
🤔 这个变动的性质是?
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit