Skip to content

Conversation

@Rohit-0505
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add IPAM example manifests for IP allocation to subnets of type IPv4
  • Add IPAM example manifests for IP allocation to subnets of type IPv6

/ref #1129

@Rohit-0505 Rohit-0505 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2024 07:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/L documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Oct 29, 2024
@Rohit-0505 Rohit-0505 self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@Rohit-0505 Rohit-0505 force-pushed the enh/e2e-ipam-example branch from 4ea387d to 0dcc797 Compare October 31, 2024 06:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/M and removed size/L labels Nov 4, 2024
@Rohit-0505 Rohit-0505 force-pushed the enh/e2e-ipam-example branch from 2ac07c4 to 5aea20e Compare November 6, 2024 05:38
Copy link
Member

@afritzler afritzler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we remove example from the folder name and just use ipam-ipv4 and ipam-ipv6?

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Nov 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/M and removed size/L labels Nov 11, 2024
@afritzler afritzler merged commit 6a612a0 into main Nov 13, 2024
13 checks passed
@afritzler afritzler deleted the enh/e2e-ipam-example branch November 13, 2024 08:51
balpert89 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
* Add e2e `IPAM` example manifests for `IPv4` and `IPv6`

* address review comments

* address review comment
@hardikdr hardikdr added the area/iaas Issues related to IronCore IaaS development. label Jun 26, 2025
@hardikdr hardikdr added this to Roadmap Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/iaas Issues related to IronCore IaaS development. documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request size/M

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants