Skip to content

[SYCL][DOC] Add design document for SYCL-RTC #19698

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jopperm
Copy link
Contributor

@jopperm jopperm commented Aug 4, 2025

No description provided.

@jopperm jopperm self-assigned this Aug 4, 2025
@jopperm jopperm requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2025 16:00
@jopperm jopperm requested review from aelovikov-intel and a team August 4, 2025 16:00
@sommerlukas
Copy link
Contributor

@intel/dpcpp-doc-reviewers @intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers The workflow to generate documentation seems to be broken due to a dependency version mismatch: https://github.com/intel/llvm/actions/runs/16728105137/job/47349068323?pr=19698

Copy link
Contributor

@sommerlukas sommerlukas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, text looks good to me, just two minor comments.

I think we should also include this new file in sycl/doc/index.rst.

Comment on lines +301 to +304
At the moment, the support is available in [daily
builds](https://github.com/intel/llvm/releases) of the open-source version of
DPC++.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
At the moment, the support is available in [daily
builds](https://github.com/intel/llvm/releases) of the open-source version of
DPC++.

This is prone to be outdated, better to remove it.

code module into smaller units (either as requested by the user, or required by
the ESIMD mode), and to compute the properties that need to be passed to the
SYCL runtime when the device images are loaded.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could mention the code duplication and the plans to remove it in the future here.

Copy link
Contributor

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

Comment on lines +227 to +229
*preprocessed* source string, i.e. with all `#include` directives resolved. We
additionally compute a hash value of the rendered command-line arguments, and
append it to the hash of the preprocessed source to obtain the final cache key.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd expect clang's PCH to have to deal with the same issue. Have you looked into re-using that infrastructure?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants