-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
feat: Provide a summary of nominee known participation to the nomcom members #9857
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Updated at least one page of the NomCom private site to link to this detailed page |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9857 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.54% 88.54%
=======================================
Files 316 316
Lines 42265 42274 +9
=======================================
+ Hits 37423 37431 +8
- Misses 4842 4843 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
As this issue was raised by @MikeBishop for this NomCom this might be interesting to run / deploy it on sandbox quickly once all the checks are completed successfully. |
|
I've given the nomcom a custom report for now. There's a lot that's good in this PR but it should move to /person/ and it can't deal with past roles correcty - the data the datatracker has about them is incomplete at best and misleading at worst. See the tools-discuss/chairs discussion about how poorly the datatracker can talk about the past chairs of a working group at the moment. We will need a data collection effort before we start reporting on anything more than what roles a person hold right now. |
|
I was not aware of the report, so, nothing urgent anymore. I agree with the past roles. I can move the last 5 years of meetings in the normal /people/ page if you prefer and remove the people/details one |
Just checking: Is this really something we want to summarize for any anonymous person to quickly see about any other person? The data is public already, but it takes work to compile the summary. I would like to talk a bit more about the privacy implications before we add it here. In the short term, a single page that concentrates this for nomcom members to see the values for all the nominees is something I expect nomcoms to ask for (rather than clicking through to each person's person page). |
|
I share the privacy concern. Leave it nomcom only. |
|
Up to the tools-team of course, but this smells like security by obfuscation as the data is easy to grab via the datatracker API anyway. |
Not sure it's easy but yes, it's adding a speed bump in favor of a nod to privacy. |
Address #9822
I did not dare to modify the /person/[email protected] hence a new URL /person/[email protected]/details
I.e., some pages in the NomCom part should probably be modified to point to this new /person/[email protected]/details