feat: copy the 1wg files to so... many... places...

[rjsparks]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.81%. Comparing base (def346e) to head (72438a2).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
ietf/group/tasks.py	66.66%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8347      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.71%   88.81%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         310      312       +2     
  Lines       40882    40877       -5     
==========================================
+ Hits        36270    36305      +35     
+ Misses       4612     4572      -40     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jennifer-richards]

If this were likely to be long-lived, I'd prefer refactoring CHARTER_COPY_PATH as a list. However, as I don't think that's true and we want to encourage adding more dests, this is fine.

[rjsparks]

and we want to encourage adding more dests

🕶️

If ... refactoring ... list ...

That's the refactor I started down that led to me asking about typechecking iterables, but we would have to gut the current implemenation of the utility that creates temporary directories at settings names to make that work.

I'm still contemplating creating a new file/class to handle external persistence and isolate all the concerns there, at which point the structure of the relevant settings could be entirely reconsidered.

In any case, when we stop having directories, the tmp directory solution in the utility will be obviated.

[jennifer-richards]

and we want to encourage adding more dests

🕶️

Oops, I left out the "don't"