[codegen] Test and document codegen for SplitAt and Split#3111
[codegen] Test and document codegen for SplitAt and Split#3111jswrenn wants to merge 1 commit intoG597bda54d270c35d807e04218fc99b8deec41473from
SplitAt and Split#3111Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the testing and documentation of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds documentation and tests for code generation related to SplitAt and Split. This is achieved by adding #[derive(SplitAt)] to benchmark structs, introducing new benchmark files, and incorporating codegen_section! and codegen_header! attributes into the documentation of methods in src/split_at.rs. The changes are generally well-executed and align with the PR's objectives. I have a couple of minor suggestions regarding documentation formatting to improve consistency.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## G597bda54d270c35d807e04218fc99b8deec41473 #3111 +/- ##
==========================================================================
Coverage 91.87% 91.87%
==========================================================================
Files 20 20
Lines 6057 6057
==========================================================================
Hits 5565 5565
Misses 492 492 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
a5c1734 to
82b7a65
Compare
gherrit-pr-id: G09ea59a47925616837b859b2c3cdf7f0f919232e
82b7a65 to
355fd79
Compare
new_box#3120FromZeros#3114SplitAtandSplit#3111IntoBytes#3109Latest Update: v9 — Compare vs v8
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.
⬇️ Download this PR
Branch
git fetch origin refs/heads/G09ea59a47925616837b859b2c3cdf7f0f919232e && git checkout -b pr-G09ea59a47925616837b859b2c3cdf7f0f919232e FETCH_HEADCheckout
git fetch origin refs/heads/G09ea59a47925616837b859b2c3cdf7f0f919232e && git checkout FETCH_HEADCherry Pick
git fetch origin refs/heads/G09ea59a47925616837b859b2c3cdf7f0f919232e && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEADPull
Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.