-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62.4k
Update renaming-a-branch.md #32057
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update renaming-a-branch.md #32057
Conversation
In the situation described, the local repository was cloned from the remote origin repository (presumably GitHub) at some point in the past before `OLD-BRANCH-NAME` had been renamed to `NEW-BRANCH-NAME` in the remote repository, GitHub. Using ``` git branch -u origin/OLD-BRANCH-NAME NEW-BRANCH-NAME ``` sets the local `NEW-BRANCH-NAME` to track the remote `origin/OLD-BRANCH-NAME`, which does not exist in the situation described (because it has been changed to `NEW-BRANCH-NAME`). The correct command for this situation is: ``` git branch -u origin/NEW-BRANCH-NAME NEW-BRANCH-NAME ``` which is what the docs previously said (prior to [this PR](github#31929) being merged).
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
Automatically generated comment ℹ️This comment is automatically generated and will be overwritten every time changes are committed to this branch. The table contains an overview of files in the Content directory changesYou may find it useful to copy this table into the pull request summary. There you can edit it to share links to important articles or changes and to give a high-level overview of how the changes in your pull request support the overall goals of the pull request.
fpt: Free, Pro, Team |
@aecoleman Thank you for opening this PR, along with providing context! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ |
@aecoleman Thanks so much for catching this, and opening a PR with this fix! I'll update the branch and get this merged once tests are passing 🍏 |
Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. If you're looking for your next contribution, check out our help wanted issues ⚡ |
Why:
The changes made in PR#31929 are not correct in the context that the docs describe.
The context is "After you rename a branch in a repository on GitHub, any collaborator with a local clone of the repository will need to update the clone." Based on this, the section should be presenting actions to be taken in the situation where
OLD-BRANCH-NAME
has been renamed toNEW-BRANCH-NAME
on GitHub, butOLD-BRANCH-NAME
still exists in the local clone, and still has upstream set toorigin/OLD-BRANCH-NAME
.The desired end-state in this situation would be for the local clone to contain no branch named
OLD-BRANCH-NAME
, and one branch namedNEW-BRANCH-NAME
, which tracks the remote branch of the same nameorigin/NEW-BRANCH-NAME
.The commands listed now result in a local clone containing no branch named
OLD-BRANCH-NAME
, and one branch namedNEW-BRANCH-NAME
, which tracks the remote branch with the nameorigin/OLD-BRANCH-NAME
, which should no longer exist.Closes:
What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
Check off the following:
I have reviewed my changes in staging, available via the View deployment link in this PR's timeline (this link will be available after opening the PR).
data
directory.For content changes, I have completed the self-review checklist.