Skip to content

Correct semantics to use isolation scope and not current scope #42

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

sl0thentr0py
Copy link
Member

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py commented Jun 13, 2025

Previously this library was based on hubs which should map to the isolation scope now and not the current scope.

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py changed the title WIP fix mess Correct semantics to use isolation scope and not current scope Jun 16, 2025
Previously this library was based on hubs which maps to the isolation
scope now.
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 10:49
Copy link
Member

@antonpirker antonpirker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, thanks for looking into this!

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py merged commit 268c978 into main Jun 16, 2025
12 checks passed
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py deleted the neel/fix-potel branch June 16, 2025 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants