Skip to content

Conversation

@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor

How to categorize this PR?

/area TODO
/kind TODO
/platform gcp

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Increase node controller workers for cloud-controller-manager

@kon-angelo kon-angelo requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2025 11:35
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review platform/gcp Google cloud platform/infrastructure labels Jul 30, 2025
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@kon-angelo Labels area/todo, kind/todo do not exist.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 30, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 30, 2025
@hebelsan
Copy link
Contributor

Isn't that something we might want to make configurable for the user?

@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes possibly. Since this component resides on the control-plane I am not sure we have a good way to restrict noisy neighbour situations. Why wouldn't any shoot owner just configure this value to e.g. max integer ?

Ideally we would autoscale component values based on the cluster size. Our values for the controllers workers are low across the board and we need to re-evaluate them. Otherwise as you suggest we can expose some things, but not without thinking broader effects. This PR is only solving the issue short-term

Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jul 31, 2025
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit 7d3d70d into gardener:master Aug 7, 2025
27 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

platform/gcp Google cloud platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants