-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
ci: use make through cmake
#2746
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
9806668 to
51c6497
Compare
Perf diff from master - unit testsHeap diff from master - unit testsHeap diff from master - scap fileBenchmarks diff from master |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2746 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.56% 74.56%
=======================================
Files 292 292
Lines 29998 29998
Branches 4651 4651
=======================================
Hits 22367 22367
Misses 7631 7631
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
a0a81ee to
426411d
Compare
irozzo-1A
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm nice clean-up!
|
kernel-tests-dev CI failures are not related to these changes. |
|
/hold |
426411d to
c1e7f2d
Compare
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Contextually, use the maximum level of parallelism with `--parallel $(nproc)`. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Contextually, build `unit-test-libsinsp`, `bench` and `sinsp-example` together in the same `cmake` invocation and use the maximum level of parallelism with `--parallel $(nproc)`. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Contextually, use the maximum level of parallelism with `--parallel $(nproc)`. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Contextually, use the maximum level of parallelism with `--parallel $(nproc)`. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
Avoid using directly `make` by replacing its invocations with `cmake` ones. Contextually, use the maximum level of parallelism with `--parallel $(nproc)`. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
0bca40b to
3853c26
Compare
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <[email protected]>
fe5f704 to
4f97098
Compare
|
/remove-hold |
irozzo-1A
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ekoops, irozzo-1A The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area CI
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR avoids using directly
makeby replacing its invocations withcmakeones wherever possible. Contextually, it tries to use the maximum level of parallelism possible with--parallel $(nproc).Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
/milestone 0.23.0
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: