ci: replace ubuntu-latest with ubuntu-24.04

[ekoops]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind test

/kind feature

/kind sync

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area API-version

/area build

/area CI

/area driver-kmod

/area driver-bpf

/area driver-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-bpf

/area libscap-engine-gvisor

/area libscap-engine-kmod

/area libscap-engine-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-nodriver

/area libscap-engine-noop

/area libscap-engine-source-plugin

/area libscap-engine-savefile

/area libscap

/area libpman

/area libsinsp

/area tests

/area proposals

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

/version driver-API-version-major

/version driver-API-version-minor

/version driver-API-version-patch

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-major

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-minor

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-patch

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR replaces ubuntu-latest with ubuntu-24.04.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

/milestone 0.23.0

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[github-actions]

Perf diff from master - unit tests

     4.80%    +13.26%  [.] std::__shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr(std::__weak_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2> const&, std::nothrow_t)
     3.84%    +10.55%  [.] std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_get_use_count() const
     4.49%     +9.30%  [.] sinsp_threadinfo::get_main_thread()
     3.77%     +9.04%  [.] std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_add_ref_lock_nothrow()
     3.60%     +6.85%  [.] sinsp_threadinfo::update_main_fdtable()
     6.44%     +6.63%  [.] std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release()
     3.38%     +6.27%  [.] sinsp_threadinfo::get_fd_table()
    12.28%     -5.35%  [.] sinsp::next(sinsp_evt**)
     2.25%     +5.04%  [.] std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count(std::__weak_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2> const&, std::nothrow_t)
     1.97%     +4.10%  [.] thread_group_info::get_first_thread() const

Heap diff from master - unit tests

peak heap memory consumption: 27.68K
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Heap diff from master - scap file

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Benchmarks diff from master

Comparing gbench_data.json to /root/actions-runner/_work/libs/libs/build/gbench_data.json
Benchmark                                                         Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_sinsp_split_mean                                            -0.0418         -0.0419           248           237           247           237
BM_sinsp_split_median                                          -0.0411         -0.0412           248           237           247           237
BM_sinsp_split_stddev                                          +0.1204         +0.0908             1             2             1             1
BM_sinsp_split_cv                                              +0.1692         +0.1385             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_mean                  -0.0057         -0.0059            70            70            70            70
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_median                -0.0065         -0.0063            70            69            69            69
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_stddev                +1.5007         +1.4985             1             2             1             2
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_relative_path_cv                    +1.5150         +1.5134             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_mean                     -0.0067         -0.0066            44            44            44            44
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_median                   +0.0016         +0.0016            44            44            44            44
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_stddev                   -0.5900         -0.5916             1             0             1             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_empty_path_cv                       -0.5872         -0.5889             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_mean                  -0.0334         -0.0334            71            69            71            69
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_median                -0.0363         -0.0364            71            69            71            69
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_stddev                +1.7369         +1.8279             0             0             0             0
BM_sinsp_concatenate_paths_absolute_path_cv                    +1.8316         +1.9258             0             0             0             0

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.52%. Comparing base (0d61d53) to head (e2e9709).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2743   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.52%   74.52%           
=======================================
  Files         291      291           
  Lines       30012    30012           
  Branches     4714     4714           
=======================================
  Hits        22366    22366           
  Misses       7646     7646           

Flag	Coverage Δ
libsinsp	74.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[irozzo-1A]

/lgtm

[deepskyblue86]

/approve

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepskyblue86, ekoops, irozzo-1A

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [deepskyblue86,ekoops]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment