-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49.2k
Add CircleCI support to 15-stable #8778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…o Yarn (facebook#8309) * Update ESLint to 3.10.2 Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value. Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow. * Update yarn.lock after the eslint update. * Fix all new eslint failures Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline. * Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm
* Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms * Remove the caching Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary. The bottleneck is executors, not build time. * Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner * Regenerate yarn lockfile
Nothing really changes.
D4329549
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@ var DOMRenderer = ReactFiberReconciler({ | |||
return true; | |||
}, | |||
|
|||
commitUpdate(domElement : Instance, oldProps : Props, newProps : Props, children : HostChildren<Instance>) : void { | |||
domElement.innerHTML = ''; | |||
recursivelyAppendChildren(domElement, children); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you avoid this change?
It's a bit messy because the histories diverged.
I only changed this method here because Flow complained at domElement.textContent = newProps.children;
assignment. However in 15-stable
this code didn't exist in the first place so we can safely leave the old implementation here.
Looks great. Now that I think of it, I wonder if we should have done this against Any chance you could look into what it would take to submit this PR against |
Going to get this in and cherry-pick to |
* devDependencies: add core-js and es6-symbol polyfill for tests * Update Flow and fix issues (#8006) * Add npm v4.0.0 support (#8082) * Add support for node v7 (#8135) * Upgrade ESLint and dependencies, fix new lint errors, switch Travis to Yarn (#8309) * Update ESLint to 3.10.2 Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value. Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow. * Update yarn.lock after the eslint update. * Fix all new eslint failures Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline. * Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm * Update all Jest packages to 17.x (#8327) * Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms * Remove the caching Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary. The bottleneck is executors, not build time. * Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner * Regenerate yarn lockfile * Update Flow to 0.37.0 (#8608) Nothing really changes. * Update to Jest 18 (#8621) * mockImpl -> mockImplementation D4329549 * Fixed linting errors * circle.yml and circleci scripts * Update Flow and fix issues (#8006) * Fixed flow errors * Updated shrinkwrap * Removed unnecessary change * Added jest --runInBand flag * Removed ReactDOMFiber changes
It worked! That was awesome. Thank you so much, it's a very meaningful contribution. Usually people don't like tasks like this but it's super useful when somebody can help out. |
No problem! Thanks for your help along the way. I'm glad I could help out and learn more about the codebase. |
This is a second attempt at fixing #8744 after better understanding the problem space.
I cherry-picked commits to
package.json
to bring it closer tomaster
and then added thecircle.yml
andscripts/circleci
changes needed to run CircleCI.