Skip to content

[compiler] Validate against JSX in try statements #30725

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

josephsavona
Copy link
Member

@josephsavona josephsavona commented Aug 16, 2024

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 16, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-compiler-playground ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 17, 2024 0:07am

josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

ghstack-source-id: 5f00467
Pull Request resolved: #30725
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added CLA Signed React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team labels Aug 16, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

[ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

ghstack-source-id: d50298c
Pull Request resolved: #30725
> 14 | console.log(el);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 15 | }
| ^^^^ Todo: (BuildHIR::lowerStatement) Handle TryStatement without a catch clause (6:15)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm adding this pre-emptively so that when we support try w only a finally clause, we'll see this either continue to correctly fail or notice that the validation doesn't work and have a chance to fix it

Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

[ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

ghstack-source-id: c0f54b8
Pull Request resolved: #30725
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

[ghstack-poisoned]
josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

ghstack-source-id: 0bc722a
Pull Request resolved: #30725
@josephsavona josephsavona merged commit 1c3d4bd into gh/josephsavona/36/base Aug 19, 2024
19 checks passed
josephsavona added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
Per comments on the new validation pass, this disallows creating JSX (expression/fragment) within a try statement. Developers sometimes use this pattern thinking that they can catch errors during the rendering of the element, without realizing that rendering is lazy. The validation allows us to teach developers about the error boundary pattern.

ghstack-source-id: 0bc722a
Pull Request resolved: #30725
@josephsavona josephsavona deleted the gh/josephsavona/36/head branch August 19, 2024 18:24
* is itself nested inside an outer try.
*/
export function validateNoJSXInTryStatement(fn: HIRFunction): void {
const activeTryBlocks: Array<BlockId> = [];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: should this be a set of ids? do duplicates matter?

@gsathya
Copy link
Contributor

gsathya commented Aug 21, 2024

very cool, i like how this tracks if we're in a try block by checking if there's an upcoming catch handler!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed React Core Team Opened by a member of the React Core Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants