Skip to content

1884: move SELFBALANCE op from 0x46 to 0x47 #2180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
eip-automerger merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2019
Merged

1884: move SELFBALANCE op from 0x46 to 0x47 #2180

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions EIPS/eip-1884.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ category: Core
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/opcode-repricing/3024
status: Draft
created: 2019-03-28
requires: 150
requires: 150, 1052
---


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ At block `N`,
- The `SLOAD` (`0x54`) operation changes from `200` to `800` gas,
- The `BALANCE` (`0x31`) operation changes from `400` to `700` gas,
- The `EXTCODEHASH` (`0x3F`) operation changes from `400` to `700` gas,
- A new opcode, `SELFBALANCE` is introduced at `0x46`.
- A new opcode, `SELFBALANCE` is introduced at `0x47`.
- `SELFBALANCE` pops `0` arguments off the stack,
- `SELFBALANCE` pushes the `balance` of the current address to the stack,
- `SELFBALANCE` is priced as `GasFastStep`, at `5` gas.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ opcodes: `EXTBALANCE(address)` and `SELFBALANCE`, and have two different prices.

### `EXTCODEHASH`

`EXTCODEHASH` was introduced in Constantinople, with [EIP 1052](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052). It was priced at `400` with the reasoning:
`EXTCODEHASH` was introduced in Constantinople, with [EIP-1052](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052). It was priced at `400` with the reasoning:

> The gas cost is the same as the gas cost for the `BALANCE` opcode because the execution of the `EXTCODEHASH` requires the same account lookup as in `BALANCE`.

Expand Down