Skip to content

removed duplicate #1454

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

removed duplicate #1454

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

Danyylka
Copy link
Contributor

@Danyylka Danyylka commented Mar 4, 2025

duplicate card removed

<Card title="Deploying crosschain event composability (contests)" href="/stack/interop/tutorials/event-contests" icon={} />

@Danyylka Danyylka requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 22:26
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ac25016
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67c87fdfe567cd0008ccb9c4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1454--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request removes a duplicate <Card> component from the tutorials page in the interop section. The card titled "Deploying crosschain event composability (contests)" initially appeared twice in the file, and this change retains only the first instance while eliminating the redundant second instance. The modification cleans up the content in the file without affecting the overall functionality or other components on the page.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix broken links #1212: The changes in this PR involve removing a duplicate <Card> component, which is related to the current PR as both address redundancy in tutorial cards.
  • Convert erc20 to serc20 tutorial #1403: This PR adds a duplicate of the same <Card> component, indicating a conflict with the removal implemented in this pull request.

Suggested reviewers

  • krofax

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6766de4 and ac25016.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/operators/node-operators/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • pages/operators/node-operators/architecture.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho merged commit 8a31ca2 into ethereum-optimism:main Mar 5, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants