Skip to content

[release-3.6] Reject the client request if the client certificate has been revoked#22019

Closed
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
etcd-io:release-3.6from
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-22007-to-release-3.6
Closed

[release-3.6] Reject the client request if the client certificate has been revoked#22019
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit into
etcd-io:release-3.6from
k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-22007-to-release-3.6

Conversation

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #22007

/assign ahrtr

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wenjiaswe for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Tip

We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain /lgtm and other bot rights. We recommend asking approvers on your previous PRs to sponsor you.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ahrtr

ahrtr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ok-to-test

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.84%. Comparing base (1663b36) to head (9dd3ef9).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
server/embed/serve.go 0.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
server/embed/serve.go 58.98% <0.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️

... and 26 files with indirect coverage changes

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-3.6   #22019      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        68.87%   68.84%   -0.03%     
===============================================
  Files              420      420              
  Lines            35873    35894      +21     
===============================================
+ Hits             24708    24712       +4     
- Misses            9715     9731      +16     
- Partials          1450     1451       +1     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1663b36...9dd3ef9. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ahrtr

ahrtr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test pull-etcd-e2e-amd64

@ahrtr

ahrtr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @fuweid @ivanvc @serathius

@ahrtr

ahrtr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

superseded by #22025

@ahrtr ahrtr closed this Jul 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants