Skip to content

Executing shard recovery in project context #130525

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Executing shard recovery in project context #130525

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+10 −1

Conversation

ywangd
Copy link
Member

@ywangd ywangd commented Jul 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

See title

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added v9.2.0 serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually labels Jul 3, 2025
@ywangd ywangd added >non-issue :Distributed Indexing/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. labels Jul 11, 2025
@ywangd ywangd requested a review from pxsalehi July 11, 2025 05:57
@ywangd ywangd marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2025 05:58
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team label Jul 11, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-indexing (Team:Distributed Indexing)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pxsalehi pxsalehi Awaiting requested review from pxsalehi

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. >non-issue serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team v9.2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ywangd @elasticsearchmachine