Skip to content

ci: update bake-action to v6 #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025
Merged

ci: update bake-action to v6 #63

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

crazy-max
Copy link
Member

closes #62

Update bake-action to v6 and also distribute validate targets to dedicated runners.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.73%. Comparing base (a33364e) to head (fee93a5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #63   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.73%   67.73%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         623      623           
=======================================
  Hits          422      422           
  Misses        139      139           
  Partials       62       62           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@crazy-max crazy-max requested a review from thaJeztah January 10, 2025 09:49
@crazy-max crazy-max marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 09:50
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@thaJeztah thaJeztah merged commit da2cb99 into docker:main Jan 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@crazy-max crazy-max deleted the bake-v6 branch January 10, 2025 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants