Coverage goal filters aren't messaget

[tautschnig]

The classes didn't use messaget anyway.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5589 (e6abdd0) into develop (c1c0356) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #5589   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    69.32%   69.33%           
========================================
  Files         1242     1242           
  Lines       100418   100409    -9     
========================================
- Hits         69619    69614    -5     
+ Misses       30799    30795    -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cproversmt2	43.09% <22.22%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
regression	66.22% <22.22%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit	32.26% <66.66%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/goto-instrument/cover.cpp	84.78% <66.66%> (+0.49%)	⬆️
src/goto-instrument/cover_filter.h	86.95% <66.66%> (+6.95%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1c0356...e6abdd0. Read the comment docs.