Skip to content

Revert "Disable OSX builds" #1391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

peterschrammel
Copy link
Member

This should be merged as soon as travis macos builds perform reasonably again.

Reverts #1387

@thk123
Copy link
Contributor

thk123 commented Sep 15, 2017

I suggest we restart the build every evening to see if it has got better (the last build took 5 hours so definitely not yet fixed...)

@thk123
Copy link
Contributor

thk123 commented Sep 19, 2017

Ran this last night, took 2 hrs 28 min so I think that is still slow (albeit faster...) I will try again tonight.

@peterschrammel peterschrammel force-pushed the revert-1387-feature/disable-mac-builds branch from 7fd9f8e to abeba21 Compare October 24, 2017 15:22
@thk123
Copy link
Contributor

thk123 commented Oct 24, 2017

Builds look reasonable again, but perhaps unsurprisingly looks like something broke while these were turned off. It appears to be to do with the new symbol table unit tests. Suggest poking @smowton

This was revealed by re-enabling the OSX build, which evidently is quicker
to re-use the memory formerly occupied by the pair<key, value>!
@smowton
Copy link
Contributor

smowton commented Oct 25, 2017

Could you rebase on #1520 to find out if that fixes it as expected?

@smowton
Copy link
Contributor

smowton commented Oct 25, 2017

Never mind cherry-picked this into #1520

@peterschrammel peterschrammel force-pushed the revert-1387-feature/disable-mac-builds branch from abeba21 to 798eceb Compare October 25, 2017 09:31
@smowton
Copy link
Contributor

smowton commented Oct 26, 2017

Applied along with the corresponding fix in #1520

@smowton smowton closed this Oct 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants