Switch to dockerfile provided by openstreetmap-website

[willemarcel]

Since some months ago, there are some dockerfiles available in the openstreetmap-website repository. These dockerfiles are even used in the test suite. Although I don't know how ready for production they are, I believe they give us some confidence that it will be always compatible with the latest versions.

Should we consider switching to it? Their dockerfile seems much simpler than the osm-seed one, and probably would make it easier for us to keep it updated.

cc @batpad @Rub21

[batpad]

I'm really hoping we can simplify our Dockerfile. However, am fairly certain that the container provided on the openstreetmap-website repo is for development use and not suitable for production. @Rub21 do you have a better idea? I can also do a bit more reading, but that seemed to be the case the last time I checked.

[Rub21]

@batpad @willemarcel , It think this is something that we should try, the current Dockerfile does not support the latest version of openstreetmap-website and it is a disadvantage of osm-seed, i think for make it available for production we may need to consider some extra libraries such as. Passenger + Apache modulo .

[spwoodcock]

The official image https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/Dockerfile is not well optimised and far too bloated. I would not recommend it IMO.

Plus we need to add cgimap and our own init scripts anyway, so at best we will be extending it.

Note

I do think the osm-seed Dockerfile also needs to be optimised though.

This should be addressed by #338