Skip to content

fix-typos #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2025
Merged

fix-typos #92

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2025

Conversation

jessekrubin
Copy link
Contributor

teeeensy typo fixes

I was in the wrong directory when I ran typos and it caught a few tiny spelling mistakes.

PS: I am a hariball speller

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.10%. Comparing base (435870c) to head (e45b8a2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #92   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.10%   84.10%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines        1139     1139           
  Branches     1139     1139           
=======================================
  Hits          958      958           
  Misses        120      120           
  Partials       61       61           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Owner

@davidhewitt davidhewitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@davidhewitt davidhewitt merged commit ddfe9f1 into davidhewitt:main Jun 14, 2025
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants