Skip to content

feat:support gateway kernel client #45

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 25, 2025

Conversation

dualc
Copy link
Contributor

@dualc dualc commented Jun 24, 2025

The Gateway Kernel Client does not currently implement the execute_interactive method. To support the nbmodel functionality when using a Gateway, the Gateway Kernel Client needs to provide this method. I have submitted a PR to the jupyter-server repository to add this support: jupyter-server/jupyter_server#1535.
Additionally, in the Gateway client, the header["date"] field in channel messages is a string (related code). Therefore, the _stdin_hook should be updated to handle this format accordingly.

Copy link

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branch dualc/jupyter-server-nbmodel/feat-support-gateway-kernel-client

@dualc dualc mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2025
@echarles
Copy link
Member

Change sounds reasonable to me (have proposed to add a space for better linting). Could you edit the first comment of this PR with a bit more context on the issue faced with gateway kernel client. Thx!

@echarles echarles added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2025
@echarles
Copy link
Member

Thx. One more suggestion and we are good to go.

Copy link
Member

@echarles echarles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Thx @dualc

@echarles echarles merged commit 36154de into datalayer:main Jun 25, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants