Remove try with resource for Worfklow Worker Examples and use latest changes from durabletask-java

[siri-varma]

Description

Please explain the changes you've made

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #[issue number]

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[siri-varma]

@cicoyle @salaboy @artur-ciocanu Can you folks please review this PR ?

this is to incorporate the durabletask-java changes. Build will pass once we incorporate the new release.

[cicoyle]

thanks for adding the ternary and the followup here 👍🏻 lgtm. just need to wait for the dapr/durabletask-java release to show up in maven central and let CI run green then we can merge

[artur-ciocanu]

@siri-varma and @cicoyle I really the like the idea of being able to provide an ExecutorService to GRPC worker, but I am not following why we need to get rid of AutoClosable.

@siri-varma could you please provide a little bit more details. Thank you.

[artur-ciocanu]

@siri-varma LGTM, I get it why we need ExecutorService changes, but I am not following why we need to remove AutoClosable

[artur-ciocanu]

Please add a new line

[siri-varma]

@artur-ciocanu The durabletask-java SDK does not manage the gRPC channel when one is externally supplied. In our case, since the java-sdk provides the channel, we are responsible for managing its lifecycle.

So the try with resource was a no op today. To fix that, I’ve added close() and shutdown() methods in WorkflowRuntime to ensure proper cleanup.

As a result, in case of workers, since the gRPC server needs to run continuously, we cannot use try-with-resources — doing so would automatically invoke close(), which would prematurely shut down the server.

---

Also, the AutoCloseable is still used in the WorkflowRuntime. I just removed the try with resource from the Worker examples because of the above reason.

[siri-varma]

@cicoyle I will pull in your changes once they are merged.

[siri-varma]

Closing this. All the commits wen in this PR #1336

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.28%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (eda5253).
Report is 139 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1337      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   77.28%   +0.36%     
- Complexity     1592     1765     +173     
============================================
  Files           145      204      +59     
  Lines          4843     5388     +545     
  Branches        562      590      +28     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4164     +439     
- Misses          821      908      +87     
- Partials        297      316      +19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.