P2093 Formatted output

[wg21bot]

P2093R0 Formatted output (Victor Zverovich)

[wg21bot]

P2093R1 Formatted output (Victor Zverovich)

[brycelelbach]

2020-09-29 Library Evolution Telecon Minutes

Chair: Fabio Fracassi

Champion: Victor Zverovich

Minute Taker: Ben Craig

POLL: We prefer std::cout as the default output target.

SF	WF	N	WA	SA
3	2	6	6	5

POLL: Add a member function on ostream instead of a std::print(ostream&, ...) free function overload

SF	WF	N	WA	SA
0	2	5	17	3

Author's Position: WF

Attendance: 35

Outcome: Consensus against.

POLL: Remove std::println from the paper

SF	WF	N	WA	SA
1	10	7	4	4

Outcome: No strong consensus for change.

Author's Position: N

Attendance: 35

[wg21bot]

P2093R2 Formatted output (Victor Zverovich)

[wg21bot]

P2093R3 Formatted output (Victor Zverovich)

[brycelelbach]

Polls

Poll: We want P2093r2 to revert moving the print(ostream) overloads to the header.

Strongly Favor	Weakly Favor	Neutral	Weakly Against	Strongly Against
0	0	6	6	1

Attendance: 17

# of Authors: 1

Author Position: WA

Outcome: Keep the paper as written.

Summary

This was only a short discussion at the end of a session. As before we like the direction of the paper. No new issues came up and we affirmed the design decission of the author to put the ostream related overloads into the ostream header.

Outcome

No changes to the paper. Discussion on this paper will continue.