Skip to content

vine: better prefer dispatch#3684

Merged
btovar merged 2 commits intocooperative-computing-lab:masterfrom
btovar:vine_better_prefer_dispatch
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

vine: better prefer dispatch#3684
btovar merged 2 commits intocooperative-computing-lab:masterfrom
btovar:vine_better_prefer_dispatch

Conversation

@btovar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@btovar btovar commented Feb 29, 2024

Don't use busy waiting flag to decide to break vine's wait loop.

Post-change actions

Put an 'x' in the boxes that describe post-change actions that you have done.
The more 'x' ticked, the faster your changes are accepted by maintainers.

  • make test Run local tests prior to pushing.
  • make format Format source code to comply with lint policies. Note that some lint errors can only be resolved manually (e.g., Python)
  • make lint Run lint on source code prior to pushing.
  • Manual Update Did you update the manual to reflect your changes, if appropriate? This action should be done after your changes are approved but not merged.
  • Type Labels Select github labels for the type of this change: bug, enhancement, etc.
  • Product Labels Select github labels for the product affected: TaskVine, Makeflow, etc.
  • PR RTM Mark your PR as ready to merge.

Additional comments

This section is dedicated to changes that are ambitious or complex and require substantial discussions. Feel free to start the ball rolling.

With prefer_dispatch, return when no task could be dispatched in the
previous cycle.
@btovar btovar merged commit cb1c7e7 into cooperative-computing-lab:master Feb 29, 2024
@btovar btovar deleted the vine_better_prefer_dispatch branch February 29, 2024 18:56
btovar added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
* vine dask executor: remove repeated max-retrievals setting

* vine: don't combine busy flag with prefer_dispatch

With prefer_dispatch, return when no task could be dispatched in the
previous cycle.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants