Skip to content

ipykernel 6.11.0#119

Merged
bollwyvl merged 1 commit intoconda-forge:mainfrom
bollwyvl:ipykernel-6110
Mar 31, 2022
Merged

ipykernel 6.11.0#119
bollwyvl merged 1 commit intoconda-forge:mainfrom
bollwyvl:ipykernel-6110

Conversation

@bollwyvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@bollwyvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/ipykernel-feedstock/actions/runs/2071210636.

@blink1073
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I opened ipython/ipykernel#899 with a fix

@bollwyvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I opened ipython/ipykernel#899 with a fix

welp... conda-forge is not our CI... but i'll take it!

@bollwyvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

corollary: should we hold on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants