Add TCFG node #8730
Merged
Add TCFG node #8730
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chaObserv
requested review from
yoland68,
robinjhuang,
pythongosssss,
ltdrdata,
Kosinkadink,
webfiltered,
christian-byrne and
comfyanonymous
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This technique improves the alignment between conditional and unconditional results to reduce the negative impact of misaligned components.
In practice, the results of TCFG are similar to those produced by CFG at a lower guidance scale. However, according to the FID-CLIP curves in Figure 6, TCFG may still bring some improvements.
Test with Cosmos-Predict2-2B for regular CFG.
In this example, CFG 3.0 appears overall similar to TCFG 5.0, with some differences in details.
Test for CFG++.
TCFG++ refers to the combination of TCFG and CFG++.