Register missing task inputs for Develocity test distribution

[colinmarsch]

Summary

Fixes #1790

This PR registers two missing task inputs that were causing failures when using Develocity's test distribution feature:

1. paparazzi.test.resources - The output file from writeResourcesTask that's used as a system property
2. paparazzi.resources - The layoutlibResourcesFileCollection used in system properties

Both are now properly registered as task inputs with PathSensitivity.NONE, ensuring these files are uploaded when using Develocity test distribution.

[geoff-powell]

Nice, do you have an example of before and after where this is working? Maybe via a build scan

[colinmarsch]

Nice, do you have an example of before and after where this is working? Maybe via a build scan

I'm not exactly sure how to manually test this out. Do you have any thoughts here how to trigger a build scan or another way to verify this before/after?

[TWiStErRob]

Are we sure NONE is the right sensitivity? If the files are relocated, wouldn't we need to invalidate the inputs and re-run the task? Or is that not what it means?

[geoff-powell]

I'm not exactly sure how to manually test this out. Do you have any thoughts here how to trigger a build scan or another way to verify this before/after?

You can run whatever task like export CI="true" && ./gradlew :sample:verifyPaparazziDebug to publish build scan

[colinmarsch]

I'm not exactly sure how to manually test this out. Do you have any thoughts here how to trigger a build scan or another way to verify this before/after?

You can run whatever task like export CI="true" && ./gradlew :sample:verifyPaparazziDebug to publish build scan

I got a build scan here: https://scans.gradle.com/s/u37l6sna4uhao, tried looking around for the inputs but I can't seem to find them 🤔

[colinmarsch]

Are we sure NONE is the right sensitivity? If the files are relocated, wouldn't we need to invalidate the inputs and re-run the task? Or is that not what it means?

I don't think the paths are relevant here and only the content of these matter for the invalidation. Happy to change this if there is something I'm missing here though!