Skip to content

Conversation

@mr-cal
Copy link
Collaborator

@mr-cal mr-cal commented Aug 8, 2025

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you signed the CLA?
  • Have you successfully run make lint?
  • Have you successfully run make test?

Now that LP#2077005 and LP#2098811, Snapcraft can drop the restriction about using --build-for when shorthand platforms are provided.

@mr-cal mr-cal marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2025 19:56
@mr-cal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mr-cal commented Aug 11, 2025

Spread failures unrelated.

@mr-cal mr-cal force-pushed the work/remote-build-shorthand branch from 0bd7155 to 1c5e371 Compare August 11, 2025 20:09
@mr-cal mr-cal removed the request for review from medubelko August 11, 2025 20:09
Signed-off-by: Callahan Kovacs <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JJ Coldiron <[email protected]>
@mr-cal mr-cal requested a review from a team August 11, 2025 21:52
@mr-cal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mr-cal commented Aug 11, 2025

I'm not going to re-run the manual tests after making a doc change. Here's the latest remote build test: https://github.com/canonical/snapcraft/actions/runs/16890932175/job/47850749696

@lengau lengau merged commit aa2d9ef into main Aug 15, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@lengau lengau deleted the work/remote-build-shorthand branch August 15, 2025 18:20
jahn-junior added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
EdmilsonRodrigues pushed a commit to EdmilsonRodrigues/snapcraft that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants