enhance: Add Microsoft Outlook - Mail Actions PR3419

[Wendong-Fan]

Description

Describe your changes in detail (optional if the linked issue already contains a detailed description of the changes).

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide (required)
• I have linked this PR to an issue using the Development section on the right sidebar or by adding Fixes #issue-number in the PR description (required)
• I have checked if any dependencies need to be added or updated in pyproject.toml and uv lock
• I have updated the tests accordingly (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
• I have updated the documentation if needed:
• I have added examples if this is a new feature

If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch outlook

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Tanuj-Taneja1]

Hi @Wendong-Fan
A major issue with this pr
The post(), get(), patch() in msgraph are async-only, making the functions synchronous cause errors errors like

/content/camel/camel/toolkits/microsoft_outlook_mail_toolkit.py:899: RuntimeWarning: coroutine 'SendMailRequestBuilder.post' was never awaited
  self.client.me.send_mail.post(request)
RuntimeWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback

This basically causes all the tools to be unusable. I dont think these changes have been shiped to the new version yet so we should probably revert it back
(Sorry I was out on vacation so could not look at the pr sooner)

[Tanuj-Taneja1]

Hi @Wendong-Fan
Shouldnt we include inline attachments to include screenshots and other attachments that might be releveant?

[Tanuj-Taneja1]

Hi @Wendong-Fan Shouldnt we include inline attachments to include screenshots and other attachments that might be releveant?

Hi @Wendong-Fan , we have fixed the major issue in the pr just this minor issue remain, i think it is better to have meta data details of inline images as well like screenshot in list message tool. Would like your opinion on this.

[Tanuj-Taneja1]

Hi @fengju0213 can you also take a look at this pr since it reverts some of your changes (mainly async related).