-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
multiple regression functions with table argument #1763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function can't possibly be needed as written; don't we have
multiple-regression
already? This looks like copy-pasted code, and fiddly code at that, so we should deduplicate it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference is that the current trio of functions take a table, and column names as arguments. The Bootstrap group decided that all three outputs (viz., list of coefficients, table of coefficients, and predictor function) were needed, and it wasn't clear which one (or perhaps two) should be treated as basic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not my point. We already have https://github.com/brownplt/pyret-lang/blob/horizon/src/arr/trove/statistics.arr#L236-L244 that defines
B_pred_fun
; don't duplicate that code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a duplicate.
multiple-regression-fun
callsmultiple-regression-coeffs
to get a list of coefficients, which it callsB
. TheB_pred_fn
then usesfold2
to do a dot-product its argument list withB
. It avoids having to convert the argument list to a vector.In the original
multiple-regression
, we get a vector of coefficients, which it callsB
. ItsB_pred_fn
converts its argument list into a vector and then performs a vector dot product with the vectorB
.The only commonality between the two
B_pred_fn
s is that they check the length of their incoming list the same way to decide if an exception needs to be thrown. Once past that check, the body is different.One could write an external function that is called in both places (with
B
as argument) to createB_pred_fn
, but even so, one would have to do an extra list/vector casting in one of the two functions, so that theB
s are the same type.