-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
BIP3: drop optional License Code header #1904
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BIP3: drop optional License Code header #1904
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good. Could you please also mention in the Backwards Compatibility section under Preamble that the License-Code has been sunset?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for being slow. This was on my list, thanks for taking care of it!
45af64c
to
fd16929
Compare
Updated to take all the review feedback (thanks!). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, good improvements.
@@ -555,6 +543,7 @@ mentioned in the [Changelog](#changelog) section. | |||
- The "Post-History" header is replaced with the "Discussion" header. | |||
- The optional "Version" header is introduced. | |||
- The "Discussions-To" header is dropped as it has never been used in any BIP. | |||
- The "License-Code" header has been sunset, as it was used by only five BIPs (98, 116, 117, 330, 340) and created more ambiguity than clarity. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just noticed that this says License-Code was used by five BIPs, but below line 734, it says that License-Code was used four times. I must have overlooked BIP 340. But since line 546 is just being introduced here, perhaps it could be made consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, done.
Co-authored-by: Tim Ruffing <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Murch <[email protected]>
per https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode.en and add a missing word Co-authored-by: Tim Ruffing <[email protected]>
fd16929
to
6f2f4aa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 6f2f4aa
based on @real-or-random's #1892 (comment).
Also a couple of minor BIP3 touch-ups.