Conversation
|
| path "${design.baseName}_design.tsv", emit: ch_expdesign | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_config.tsv", emit: ch_config | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_openms_design.tsv", emit: ch_expdesign | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_openms_config.tsv", emit: ch_config |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why, the dataset needs to keep the design.baseName in ${design.baseName}_openms_config.tsv and ${design.baseName}_openms_design.tsv should we removed @jpfeuffer @daichengxin ? leave it something like:
- openms_design.tsv
- openms_config.tsv
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have multiple runs, you will never know which is which. Definitely keep the original name there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would not call the config "openms config". The config is only for nextflow to fill the meta channel.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have multiple runs, you will never know which is which. Definitely keep the original name there.
We have for the other files now no run_name for example for the msstats, for the triqler etc.
In the pipeline we don't allow running multiple experimental design, only one. Then the analysis always correspond to one.
For conssistency if we move to the appraoch ${design.baseName} whe should do it for all the outputs msstats, triqler, openms design, pmultiqc, etc.
modules/local/pmultiqc/main.nf
Outdated
| script: | ||
| def args = task.ext.args ?: '' | ||
| def disable_pmultqic = params.enable_pmultiqc ? "" : "--disable_plugin" | ||
| def disable_pmultqic = (params.enable_pmultiqc) && (params.export_mztab) ? "" : "--disable_plugin" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Spelling! disable_pmultiqc
Co-authored-by: Julianus Pfeuffer <pfeuffer@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
|
@daichengxin can you changed to:
|
| path "${design.baseName}_design.tsv", emit: ch_expdesign | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_config.tsv", emit: ch_config | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_openms_design.tsv", emit: ch_expdesign | ||
| path "${design.baseName}_openms_config.tsv", emit: ch_config |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have multiple runs, you will never know which is which. Definitely keep the original name there.
We have for the other files now no run_name for example for the msstats, for the triqler etc.
In the pipeline we don't allow running multiple experimental design, only one. Then the analysis always correspond to one.
For conssistency if we move to the appraoch ${design.baseName} whe should do it for all the outputs msstats, triqler, openms design, pmultiqc, etc.
PR checklist
nf-core lint).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).docs/usage.mdis updated.docs/output.mdis updated.CHANGELOG.mdis updated.README.mdis updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).