d0ce07ed09d393f76889e71192d30c185c9530a5 disappeared (rebased) from 4.1 branch?

[agherzan]

Two weeks ago I managed to build 4.1 branch with the revision: d0ce07e

Now, this revision disappeared. Are rebases likely to happen on this fork? Or it was just an exception?

Regards,
Andrei

[RobertCNelson]

master branches always get rebased, use the tags:

https://github.com/beagleboard/linux/tree/4.1.4-ti-r8

Regards,

[agherzan]

Thank you.

[sykrim]

The .git/packed-refs file contains:
b1b6908a34741b6785005d30b8e76f1305ffdc23 refs/tags/4.1.4-ti-r9 ^b16e5f7b8a29f130ebcac9311988edbcc944b361
But there is not such sha ( b16e5f7 ) in your git anymore.

Can you fix this on your side please?

[RobertCNelson]

@sykrim use the tags as master gets rebased.. And make sure you didn't do a shallow clone.

https://github.com/beagleboard/linux/commits/4.1.4-ti-r9

[sykrim]

Did use the tag but when trying to clone it using poky, it says b16e5f7 does not exist anymore. Which is true, since I do not see it in the git log, but it does appear in the packed-refs file. So I guess the 4.1.4-ti-r9 tag should not reference a non-existing sha.

[RobertCNelson]

That commit show up in github's interface.

b16e5f7

[sykrim]

I have a git clone locally on my machine and git log-ing and searching for that sha returns nothing.

[sykrim]

Need to mention that this is on the 4.1 branch

[RobertCNelson]

Again.. The branches, 3.8/3.14/4.1 get 'rebased'... Use the tags from master...

[sykrim]

There is something fishy with the git repo. I do a

git branch -a --contains b16e5f7

and that comes up empty

[sykrim]

Worked around this "tag in no branch" issue from within bitbake.
Thanks for your support

[chelliwell]

@skyrim : I've also been having trouble setting yocto/bitbake to pull a specific tag - would be grateful if you'd send me the .bb that you've now got working. Thanks.